RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Foxnews.com/shep/index.html:Foxnews.com/shep

*Sponsored Links*

foxnewscomshep photos
*Sponsored Links*

Foxnews.com/shep/index.html:Foxnews.com/shep – Foxnews.com/shep/index.html/foxnews.com/shep can be found at the following address http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/shepard-smith/index.html.Foxnews.com shepherd smith is the official website of Shepard Smith who is the host of various shows on Fox such as Report with Shepard Smith ,Studio B and the Fox Report.
That’s all we have for now on Foxnews.com/shep/index.html:Foxnews.com/shep.

*Sponsored Links*
Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Fark
  • NewsVine
  • SphereIt
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Current
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks

Trackback URL

RSS Feed for This Post27 Comment(s)

  1. wanda covello | Nov 23, 2009 | Reply

    I just need an answer to this question.
    Why in the world would any person with any common sense at all, criticize Sara Palin as inexperienced and contenue to support Obama, who has much less inexperience as a Leader than she?

  2. George Hatt | Nov 24, 2009 | Reply

    How are we going to pay for troops in Afghanistan?

    The same way Obama is paying for government health care, cap and trade, car company bailout, insurance company bailout, etc. etc. Money grows on trees in Washington, doen’t it?

  3. Don | Nov 24, 2009 | Reply

    If this is such a GREAT! insurance plan then should not the people who voted yes be on the same plan?

  4. janice eklund | Nov 24, 2009 | Reply

    No new taxes. Why doesn’t Rangle pay up – also the Secretary of Treasurer – they have not paid their taxes. If I did not pay mine I would be in jail.Obama continues to party with $100 a pound steak from Japan. Absolutely disgusting.
    If the public would be interested in paying for the war through taxes – the money would go into administrative pockets. New homes, cars, etc. would pop up. For certain. So Shep – NO more taxes. Why doesn’t Congress contribute the millions they have snared through deals.
    Congressmen are thieves – majority are dishonest. Get the 300 million back from LA. Anothere dishonest deal. We are aware of double dealing congressmen – so they can all go to hell.

  5. Carol Anderson | Nov 24, 2009 | Reply

    Shep,
    So funny to see the two attorneys arguing on your show a short moment ago. I was waiting for you to mediate between the two of them, but had to laugh when the camera spotted you trying to find a good email to read instead:) NO way should the wealthy people have to pay for a troop surge. I don’t have the answers, that’s what our folks in Washington get paid to do. However, they can do better than coming up with more taxes!

  6. Tony,In | Nov 24, 2009 | Reply

    Have Charlie Rangal&the DEM’S PAY THERE TAX’S

  7. janice eklund | Nov 24, 2009 | Reply

    Again, congress and the administration can not contain themselves – they are possessed to get their hands on tax money. NO more taxes. Again, Randle and the other thieves in congress need to pay their taxes. This goes for the Secretary of Treasurer also – he is a thief. He sits there as dirty as the reat of them.

  8. bill | Nov 24, 2009 | Reply

    no they have almost bankrupted this country now

  9. Betty Harrelson | Nov 24, 2009 | Reply

    I have been trying to find the question that Shep has been touting but don’t knbow how to find it.

  10. Tom Richardson | Nov 24, 2009 | Reply

    I came on your site to vote on how to pay for the war. I have not found the place to vote. I’m generaly at work and do not get the chance to do this. I thought we are suppose to being living in a Democracy that treated all fairly. I’m certainly not rich but do not think they should be singled out to pay for the war. Maybe if we had a President and congress that were more interested in keeping Americans working and not wasting billions on the bail out that has already proved to be nothing but a spending bing of power we would have the money to pay for the war. Now he and his far left group wants to put us in deeper pain and debt with a health care that know one understands and most don’t want. No I don’t have one answer how to pay, but lets go back to conserative leadership and that will be the begining.
    Tom

  11. skeeter | Nov 24, 2009 | Reply

    hiya Shep, we should not tax the rich , thats like biteing the hand that feed you.WE need to reform health ins companies to meet the family needs at a good price. The Put people back to work .Sorry to be kinda mean here but if people can go out and party, buy drugs , new clothes, new cars then scream they can;t buy health ins.That thier fault!! Not the rich!!I know thier is some that do need help,if the goverment is so hell bent on health ins
    make a co-op,and have people pay in so much a month. Not goverment run either thank you shep

  12. Thom Bishop | Nov 24, 2009 | Reply

    War Bonds are a good idea, but who is going to guarantee them?

  13. Larry, Hershey, PA | Nov 24, 2009 | Reply

    NO….. Take the money from ACORN AND THE OTHER “OBAMA SPECIAL INTERESTS”….

    Could not find the survey on the cost of war.

  14. DDarryl Powell | Nov 24, 2009 | Reply

    Shep, I tried several times to vote on your question today — who should pay for additional military personnel in Afghanistan? The wealthy should NOT pay one cent on the war. Stop the Health Care Reform Bill. No more “bail outs”. No more stimulus money given away. Stop pork barrel add ons to bills being passed. Conserve this waste of money and sufficient funds would pay for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Fire the “carzs” to save money.

  15. martha Johnson | Nov 24, 2009 | Reply

    you asked how the war should be paid for if not a tax on the rich…. The govt. could SAVE all the money they claim they will save by cutting out fraud from medicare, etc. NOW instead of overhauling the whole health system. They have said how many billions they can save…so let them do it

  16. Richard Amann | Nov 24, 2009 | Reply

    We should have MANY specific taxes.
    A tax that pays for Social Security (properly), a tax that pays for the department of education and education programs, a tax for the military and this war and more We should all get tax bills showing where the money is going.
    Until this happens we need to stop all the stimulus spending and put it into the Afghanistan War. To help the effort – if not pay for it – all Congressional salaries and perks should be stopped, with that money going into the deficit.

  17. EdCarr | Nov 24, 2009 | Reply

    Do not increase taxes for the war or ANYTHING ELSE. REDUCE TAXES AND CUT SPENDING.

    To support the war take two steps:
    1. Use the remainder of the TARP funds
    2. Greatly accelerate collection of unpaid taxes and add fines of 1000%. Government workers who should know better should pay fines of 2000% and lose their jobs for life.

  18. Keith Come sr | Nov 24, 2009 | Reply

    I really think it would be unfair to tax the wealthy just because they are wealthy. Tax alcohol thats something that we can afford to go without. Look at the problems alcohol creates.

  19. Eddie Duarte | Nov 28, 2009 | Reply

    The terrorists are not abroad, they’re right here in our Congress, pres. obama and the democrats are ruining this country from the inside, taxing us to death, an Education Czar who supports NAMBLA, Van Jones, ACORN, SEIU, a Healthcare Bill which is going to destroy the backbone of our society which is small business, I’m tired of this and I guess most people are, George W. Bush started this, just like Batista in Cuba, Batista was screwing up real bad and the Cubans wanted anyone else in power but him, so they put a slick talking young lawyer in, Does this remind you of anyone? I hope we get this guy out and put someone in who is UNITED STATES oriented and really wants to help our country, not destroy it.

  20. Ed Leab | Nov 29, 2009 | Reply

    Apparently, Mr. Obama and his staff does/can not provide sufficient supervision of a White House dinner sponsored by and to be attended by him. How then am I supposed to believe he has the talent himself, or around him, to provide security for the country?

  21. joseph frith | Dec 6, 2009 | Reply

    YOU BLEEDING HEART RINOS HAVE GOT TO STOP RELEASING CRIMMINALS EARLY. AS A HARDCORE CONSERVATIVE, AN AVID FOX WATCHER, DO NO LONGER RESPECT YOU NOR WOULD I EVER VOTE FOR YOU. YOU SIGNED YOUR OWN POLITICAL DEATH CERTIFICATE!

  22. David K. Roberts | Dec 7, 2009 | Reply

    One, Our Chrismas in the USA is Christ Birthday. Two, Our country was founded on in God we trust, That would be God the creator of the whole universe, not mohamed or budda or sunmoon or any of these other religions that have pc’d their way into our once great and God fearing country. With people at the helm like what we have and the czars we have, people better start praying to the real God. Respecfully, David K. Roberts

  23. J.T.King | Dec 9, 2009 | Reply

    We have no Govt. Just Dems & Repubs. only intrested in their movie ,hollywood images. Govt by me for me screw the rest!Obama needs a comedy show he is so funny. He fits the hollywood image.Radical,Liberal,and who knowes what else. Stay tuned1

  24. jay | Dec 15, 2009 | Reply

    As i’m listening to Obama’s speech…I’m getting madder by the second.
    What a load of crock? talking about improving lives of Amer. People.

    the Health Bill has not even been passed, my medicare and disability insurance premium already doubled come 2010, and our medicare benefits reduced.

  25. GregEdwards | Jan 7, 2010 | Reply

    How is Refusing to PASS the NOMINATED HEAD OF THE TSA POLITICAL…… when HE COULD NOT BE HIRED as a SCREENER at the AIRPORTS he will be in charge of ….BECAUSE OF HIS ACTIONS AS A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER…… infringing on the PRIVACY of an AMERICAN CITIZEN (ya it was his ex’s new boyfriend….)…. reminds me of the Democrat OFFICIAL in OHIO…that used their POSITION to spy on JOE THE PLUMBER…..
    what would this new TSA NOMINEE be WILLING TO DO FOR THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION???? WHAT???
    THERE WOULD BE NO AMERICAN SAFE from this person…if he was PRIVY to the NSA COMPUTER INFORMATION……. and he was either asked or COERCED BY THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION…….THIS REFUSAL TO PASS HIS NOMINATION IS NOT POLITICAL it’s just COMMON SENSE…. the 6 Republican Senators who are OPPOSING THIS NOMINATION….. are ACTING IN THE PEOPLES BEST INTERESTS….and it’s ABOUT TIME !!!!

  26. George Moore | Jan 29, 2010 | Reply

    When are we gonna get Senators and Represenatives in Washington instead of Republicans and Democratics. Everybill submitted should go before committee and then the floor and if passes the other chamber. A party leader or committe chair should not be able to say that bill will not be considered. Make the elected members vote on each bill and then you can see a voting record.

  27. kenneth w myers | Jan 29, 2010 | Reply

    what can be done about the s.s cost of living raise, that was taken from us, OBAMA FLY ALL OVER THE WORLD AND THE USA doing nothing ON OUR DOLLAR, need some help here kwm

RSS Feed for This PostPost a Comment